This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0146167208320557v1 34/10/1357    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Critcher, C. R. Articles by Pizarro, D. A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Critcher, C. R. Articles by Pizarro, D. A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Paying for Someone Else's Mistake: The Effect of Bystander Negligence on Perpetrator Blame

Cornell University

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: crc32{at}cornell.edu.

	Abstract

The success of criminal acts can sometimes depend critically on the oversight or negligence of uninvolved bystanders (e.g., someone leaving a first-floor window open). Four studies examined how the contribution of a negligent bystander affects blame for the perpetrator of a crime. Although participants stated that discounting blame for the perpetrator was normatively inappropriate in this context, they expected that others would make this very "error." Instead, across all four studies, bystander negligence amplified ascriptions of perpetrator blame. This amplification occurred because the bad action of the bystander provided an implicit standard of comparison for the perpetrator’s act, framing it as more blameworthy. A variety of alternative mechanisms—that bystander negligence altered perceived crime avoidability, prompted spontaneous counterfactualizing, or increased victim empathy—were tested and ruled out. Implications for legal contexts are discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?